ࡱ>  ebjbj 4e::}}}}}$$ffhhhhhh$MP}}}>>>}}f>f>>>@NE >R0>??>?}>>?: C:  Imagine Broughty Ferry: Towards a Collective Vision Monitoring Document (Presented at the event to mark the Opening of the Local Community Partnership at Castle Green Leisure Centre on 21 March 2009) Introduction As a contribution to the Ferry Local Community Plan (LCP) we have been tasked with monitoring and reviewing the action plan set out in Imagine Broughty Ferry: Towards a Collective Vision (the Vision Document) prepared in April 2007. We welcome this opportunity to continue to participate in the plan making process and its consequent monitoring and review. The purpose of this paper is to monitor the actions and outcomes which have emerged since the completion of the Vision Document almost 2 years ago. We recognise some of what has been achieved and draw attention to some of those matters which remain as challenges. In a number of areas we go further and, drawing on our understanding of current circumstances, make proposals for consideration as the way forward. Those highlighted in yellow might be taken up by voluntary and community organisations. At the outset we should make clear 3 important points. First, although we were invited by the Council to prepare our study as a part of its approach to community engagement we are all volunteers. We are completely independent of the Council in our opinions and judgements. We have gone to considerable lengths in our own time to consult as widely as we can not only through our membership of bodies such as the Dundee Civic Trust, the Broughty Ferry Community Council, the Beach Management Committee and various sub-committees of the Local Community Planning Partnership but also with our friends, neighbours, associates and members of our service clubs. This has been time consuming but interesting and, we hope, worthwhile. As will be clear from this presentation we do not pull our punches and we offer criticism where we believe that is justified by public opinion and our own assessment of matters as long established residents of Broughty Ferry. Second, the Vision Document focussed on a part only of the Ferry: the waterfront from the Stannergate to the Dichty Burn and the areas immediately adjacent to that. It was limited because it did not extend far into Central Broughty Ferry or West Ferry and it did not take in any part of Balgillo and Barnhill. On the other hand, it did focus on those areas of land which previous consultations by the Council had revealed as having numerous problems of concern for all Ferry residents. Third, we were concerned only with matters of land use and environmental amenity in general. Accordingly, our work can be only a small contribution to the Local Community Plan emanating from a small group of interested residents. The Community Plan has a much wider scope. Turning now to our main task of monitoring the extent to which the matters addressed in the Vision Document have been addressed and will be addressed in the implementation of the Local Community Plan, we take as our starting point that we are in no doubt that the aims of the Vision Document (as set out in its Section1) and the challenges (as set out in Section 2) have been recognised and now form an integral part of the Local Community Plan (LCP). In short, the next steps (as set out in its Section 8) have already been taken. This is a welcome and fundamental conclusion. The purpose of this paper is to identify in summary what else has been achieved with reference to Sections 3 to 7 inclusive and also to point out some matters which would benefit from immediate attention. Those matters which might be the focus of community initiatives are highlighted in yellow. Section 3: Towards a Brand for Broughty Ferry The starting point for our study was the conclusion of the Broughty Ferry Forum some 3 years ago that there was a need for Broughty Ferry to base its regeneration and future progress on the development of its assets and distinctive character. In short, the development of a distinctive brand which would be attractive not only to residents but also to day visitors and tourists who would come to spend time-and money-in the Ferry. Last year, we presented our views to the Broughty ferry Forum on how the branding exercise might be taken forward and took note there of all that our fellow residents had to say. It is a pleasure to record that there is now a definite commitment within the Local Community Plan to the development of a Signage Strategy for Broughty Ferry and that will contribute greatly to the successful branding of Broughty Ferry. That strategy can run in parallel with the ongoing array of environmental improvements incorporating a co-ordinated theme for the provision and renewal of street furniture (including waste bins, seating and lighting). Section 4: Some Matters of General Concern In section 4 of the Vision Document we took forward a number of general problems identified by residents: erosion and deposition on the waterfront; the appearance of the Broughty Ferry Conservation Area; the provision of sports facilities; and the 3 scourges of dog fouling, littering and graffiti. As far as erosion and deposition along the Waterfront shoreline is concerned, we understand that W S Atkins has been engaged by the Council and that options have been identified by the consultant to deal with the problems arising from deposition and erosion. A second stage of work has been commissioned and that is scheduled to be delivered to the Council some 9 months from now. In the meantime no remedial works are planned. This is disappointing since there is evidence over the past couple of years of further considerable movements (mainly erosion but some deposition) in the area of The Esplanade and beyond. However, a considered and definitive view is worth waiting for because the Consultants recommendations, and the actions consequent on them, will have important knock-on effects for the waterfront and, indeed, the wider Tay Estuary. Turning to the Broughty Ferry Conservation Area, there remains a widely held view amongst residents that the appearance of the Broughty Ferry Conservation Area is deteriorating rather than being preserved and enhanced as its designation requires. There would appear to be almost unanimous agreement that some recent developments, such as that at Beach Crescent, are out of scale and out of place. In the light of recent planning applications it would seem desirable for developers and those affected by development to be provided with clear guidance on what is, and is not, likely to be acceptable. In that context, we understand that it is open to the Department of Planning and Transportation acting under section 63 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997 to publish proposals for the preservation and enhancement of the Conservation Area. Joined up thinking would dovetail such proposals with the Local Community Plan; not to take that route would be an opportunity lost. If the resources of the Department of Planning and Transportation cannot stretch as far as the preparation and publication of proposals in that regard it would be open to the Department to set up and guide the work of a suitably qualified small group of local persons with an interest in local history and the built environment to undertake the ground work. That would encourage the trend towards community engagement and the feeling of ownership which we know the Council supports throughout Dundee. Decisions concerning specific proposals would, of course, remain with the elected members after advice from their officials. Compared to other areas in Dundee the Ferry is lacking in sports facilities readily available to the general public and, in particular, those of limited means. We understand that it is intended that there be a feasibility study undertaken in tune with Community Club concept fostered by the Scottish Football Association for a suitable location for a Hub for Indoor and Open Air Recreation in the east of the city and that the Orchar Park/ Esplanade will be included in the areas of search. Dog Fouling, Littering and Graffiti continue as problems. We understand that in certain areas including Castle Street and the vicinity of Castle Green the dog fouling problem has become worse over the past year. It has been suggested that additional dog litter bins at strategic spots would be beneficial. Littering is a problem endemic throughout Dundee and there are several hot spots within the study area. These include the Gateway to the walkway along the side of the Tay between Margaret Crescent and Douglas Terrace; the vicinity of Grassy Beach; the pebble beach adjacent to Beach Crescent; the beach extending from Broughty Ferry Castle all the way to the Dichty Burn; and the open area adjacent to the rail line stretching from Bridge Street to the Dichty Burn. We have been assured that the Council is well aware of these problems and, with them in mind, it has committed not only to monitoring each of the hot spot areas but also to continuing to improve its approach to performing its statutory duties in those vicinities. The problem of littering in Brook Street and its immediate vicinity by some school children in the uniform of Grove Academy remains an issue. The Council has devoted resources to enforcement and there is wide spread community support for punitive action where necessary, and justified, regardless of the age of the culprits. The deposition of mainly sea borne litter on the beach between Broughty Ferry Castle and Bridge Street receives special attention from the Council all to the benefit of those enjoying the area and the efforts to achieve Blue Flag status. In addition, the Criminal Justice Service continues to make a major and thoroughly helpful contribution to the reduction of litter in that vicinity. We have been assured that all this special attention will now be extended to the stretch of beach from Bridge Street to the Dichty Burn. That will have the added benefit that litter deposited there will not be transferred by tidal movement to the vicinity of the Blue Flag beach. Related to all of the above, we have learned that Aberdeen City has introduced the concept of city wardens. They have various powers all rolled together which enable them to deal with a range of community and environmental matters including littering, graffiti and dog fouling. In Dundee, as in most other Scottish cities, these scourges are dealt with by separate officers each with their own tasks and powers. We suggest that the Aberdeen approach is worthy of consideration as an efficient and effective use of the scarce resources available to the Council to deal with these matters. Section 5: Margaret Crescent to Castle Green There is widespread appreciation for the range of improvements which have been completed along the walkway which runs from the area to the south of Margaret Crescent along the north bank of the Tay as far as Douglas Terrace. As noted already the vicinity of the Gateway remains vulnerable to littering and vandalism. This sort of unpleasant behaviour is difficult to deal with; and we understand that this entry to Broughty Ferry will continue to be subject of special attention from the relevant Council Department. Following continuing pressure exerted at elected member level, the unsightly pedestrian rail bridge at Grassy Beach now in the last stage of refurbishment. There are other matters, including the storm water outfalls where, as we understand it, further progress is likely to be very slow. However, there are at least 3 matters which could be taken forward by voluntary or community based action. The stretch as a whole would benefit from some further appropriate planting and we wonder whether this is an initiative which might be taken up by the Broughty Ferry Environmental Project to build on what has been achieved by it already. Second, recent research has confirmed the importance of the historic graveyard located to the east of Douglas Terrace. This is an important part of the heritage of Broughty Ferry and it seems obvious that steps should be taken to release its potential while protecting the asset from acts of vandalism. As we understand it, there is sufficient research material available to provide the basis for a short, authoritative booklet on the subject; that could provide the basis for a board providing information for visitors; and an arrangement could be made to have entry by key available to interested persons and held locally. We note that the year 2013 will mark the centenary of the assimilation of the former Burgh of Broughty Ferry into Dundee; and we wonder whether all of this would be a suitable project for a local group of volunteers, assisted as appropriate by the Council, to mark that occasion. Third, in the Vision Document we drew attention to the deterioration of the 10 distinctive lamp standards sited on Beach Crescent and adjacent to the harbour. We have established that renewal of all the doors and columns to an acceptable standard could be achieved for under 10k. We wonder whether the raising of funds for this worthwhile exercise might be led by a local community group and /or service club with any residual made up by the Council. Moving on from there, there is still concern about the deteriorating state of Barometer Cottage. Rightly or wrongly, this reflects badly, on the Department of Planning and Transportation and the Department should continue to be urged to take such proactive steps as lie within its powers to ensure the integrity of this listed building which lies at the heart of the conservation area. Section 6: Castle Green, the Harbour and the Vicinity Castle Green, the Harbour and the immediate vicinity are vital to the branding of Broughty Ferry and the achievement of a collective vision for its future. Council officials have already given considerable thought to developing a masterplan which sets out how the vicinity might evolve. Much has been achieved recently including the refurbishment of the playpark and renovation of the community centre. However, events have moved on. In that context we are aware of the proposal to stop up and, thereafter, to grass over the roadway which separates the Castle Green from the underused, but well kept and visually attractive, walled garden ground to the east. This particular initiative, and its associated proposals, is at an early stage; and it raises numerous questions including the parking arrangements and traffic circulation in the vicinity. We understand that there will be further discussion with those likely to be affected before this next step in implementing the Master Plan is adopted. We understand also that the extent of the area covered by the masterplan is being revisited by a team of Council officials and the likelihood is that its scope will be extended to include the Esplanade in whole or part. Turning now to what in the Vision Document we termed the 3 Difficult Buildings, the refurbishment of the Castle Green Leisure Centre has been welcomed by all who use that facility. However, the decayed shed on the corner of King Street and New Road remains an eyesore. We understand that the Department of Planning and Transportation, responding to elected member pressure, has at last moved to issue an amenity notice acting under section 179 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. That section empowers planning authorities to take action where the amenity of any part of their district is adversely affected by the condition of land in their district. There should be a consequent improvement in the appearance of this relic of a bygone age. In the past year the Beach Pavilion (formerly used by East Coast Water Sports) was the subject of a planning application which was objected to by several hundred local residents. The proposal was unanimously turned away by the elected members contrary to the recommendation of its planning officers for approval. The decision of the elected members was endorsed by the Reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers. This case confirms the widely held view that officials within the Department of Planning and Transportation should take a much more robust view regarding planning applications and subsequent enforcement within the Broughty Ferry Conservation Area. We understand that the exterior of the Beach Pavilion building will be painted in April; but we are aware of a considerable body of opinion that would like to see the problem removed by the demolition of the building which is of no merit and not worth preserving thereby achieving an enhancement to the appearance and character of the conservation area. There is now an opportunity for all interested parties to give serious consideration to the adoption of a pro-active stance appropriate to the development of this site and its vicinity. It has importance not only for Broughty Ferry but also for Dundee as a whole. A means of achieving a building of outstanding quality worthy of the site should be sought. We understand that this might be the focus of attention for a Trust to be set up with its principal focus the development of the existing site and/or its immediate vicinity in mind. The Local Community Plan is committed to the development of a Heritage Strategy as an integral part of the Community Plan. We note that this will include interpretation, maps and guided walks. As we pointed out in the introduction to this paper, Central Broughty Ferry lies outside of the area identified as the focus of our study. However, the nature and level of activity there has obvious consequences for Castle Green and for the stretches of waterfront to the east and west. There is a commitment to undertake are review of traffic circulation and related matters within the Local Community Plan; and the views of local residents have been sought as part of the questionnaire circulated recently by the Community Council to residents within its area. Broughty Ferry continues to be a thriving and evolving community. In that context, Brook Street continues to evolve. The announcement that Tesco are to open one of their Express outlets before the turn of the year is good news; and we understand that progress has been made in the continuing efforts to achieve better use of certain buildings including the Burgh Halls and the YMCA. Section 7: The Esplanade (numbers refer to items within the Vision Document) The Local Community Plan is committed to take a proactive yet measured approach to the Environment. There is an opportunity to place the potential of the Esplanade at the heart of the Local Environmental Improvement Strategy. It has been accepted that individual initiatives on the Esplanade whether undertaken by the private, public or voluntary sectors when pursued without a strategic framework do not fulfil their potential in the short term; and that they fail completely in the longer term when pursued in isolation and without local support. In this respect the trial of fencing replacement along the sand dunes with willow weave situated to assist in the combat of erosion has been well received and it is to be hoped that further funding will come available for the work to be completed. However, the success of this initiative in the longer term will be all the greater if there is joined up thinking to take full account of all the factors involved including the need to maintain access to the beach for persons of all ages and abilities, the requirement to maintain the adjacent footpath free of sand, and the desirability of the provision of aesthetically pleasing signage in tune with that to be found elsewhere on the Esplanade identifying the animal exclusion zone and the period of its application. We suggest that a separate Management Plan for the Shiel Street Local Nature Reserve and its immediate vicinity should be a part of the Environmental Improvement Strategy. It is imperative for good practice that the strategy confirms that the Local Nature Reserve should retain its character as a relatively unspoiled, uncluttered nature reserve free from intrusive improvements for which space can be found on the Esplanade itself. (9/10/11/12/13) Within a thoroughly encouraging context we are bound to point out a number a number of matters urged by us in the Vision Document , without success as yet, as worthy of immediate action within the current financial year. These matters were identified some two years ago and to put matters bluntly, we cannot understand why some or all of them have not been dealt with. They involve a minimum of time and expenditure and can provide a visible confirmation that the Council is serious in following up its stated intention to improve the environment of this part of Broughty Ferry. Prioritise footpaths for improvement. The ability to walk safely and conveniently along The Esplanade is fundamental to any strategy which seeks to make the most of its potential for attracting day visitors and tourists to Broughty Ferry. The obvious poor condition of the foot path on the corner of The Esplanade and Brook Street and at the corner of The Esplanade and Rugby Terrace can be dealt with in a days work. It is inexplicable that the work has not been done. Of much greater significance is the pooling of water on the south side of The Esplanade notably between Brook Street and Panmure Street. This, on occasion, involves pedestrians of all ages and capabilities moving from the footpath to the roadway to their obvious inconvenience and detriment to safety. There are obvious serious disadvantages for those persons from the MacKinnon Centre, typically in wheel chairs, who seek to enjoy the Esplanade and its proximity to the beach. We understand that the Local Community Planning Partnership will have a role in determining the priorities for footpath upgrading/adoption and that will feed into the programme for which the Department of Planning and Transportation is responsible. The case for improvement and making this a priority for spending is soundly based on the need to provided footpaths for those who are physically challenged, who come to enjoy the local amenities as day visitors and tourists, and who can spend money in the local shops and restaurants if they can be attracted to the area. (1/4/28) As we have noted above, we subscribe to wide spread view that the appearance of the Conservation Area is deteriorating. We have been told that a review of the boundaries of the Conservation Area is being undertaken. We understand that consideration will be given to including within the revised boundaries the open space to the east of Rugby Terrace and to the west of the Glass Pavilion which provides the setting for the buildings already within the Conservation Area on Rugby Terrace and The Esplanade. We have learned that such a small extension would be warmly welcomed by the vast majority of residents in the vicinity and it would offer some degree of protection for the area from further undesirable intrusions while not restricting development which would preserve and enhance the existing quality of the built and natural environment. (2/3) We remain firmly of the view that the unsightly and poorly maintained wire litter bins in the Barnhill Rock Garden and at the eastern end of the Esplanade should be replaced at the earliest opportunity. They detract from the appearance of the area and are used as a cafeteria by seagulls. They are an obvious attraction for vermin. No more than 7 bins are required at an estimated cost of 600 each. The benefit to general amenity, and to Health and Safety in particular, more than justifies this modest expenditure. (21) The damaged fencing all along the south side of The Esplanade should be replaced and that which now serves no useful purpose should be removed. Some of it presents a hazard to unwary pedestrians. In that connection, the deteriorating chestnut palings which were introduced by the Council to assist in stabilising the sand dunes will be removed progressively over the next financial year. (22): Further along, at the eastern end of the Esplanade adjacent to the parking area at Bridge Street an area was fenced off to assist the Broughty Ferry Environmental Project in furthering its initiative in planting wild flowers. Unfortunately, that worthy experiment has failed. Nevertheless, the palings there remain in a dilapidated state with no apparent use and now very much an eyesore. They should be removed because they make no positive contribution to the area and attention should be given to returning the land to its former use as amenity grassland. It would be a considerable improvement on the south side of The Esplanade to grass over all of the land now used as storage for construction projects. There is car parking at 3 other nearby locations: at the east and west ends of the Esplanade, and to the east of the football pitch on the south side of the Esplanade. The spaces available there are far in excess of normal requirements and any peak need can be met readily by on-street parking on the Esplanade itself. We recall that part of the land in question is used for a car boot sale during Broughty Gala week. However, there would appear to be no difficulty or permanent damage to the grass at Magdalene Yard Green by its lengthy heavy use by the Carnival in the summer. One day during Gala week need cause no concern on the Esplanade. We understand that Scottish Water are investigating the differing costs involved between making good to the original car park and giving over to grass. Should the return to grass be found to be rather more costly it would secure a major environmental improvement if the Council made up the difference (25). Continuing with the theme of parking, there is a further continuing difficulty for pedestrians and those in wheel chairs seeking to use the south side of the Esplanade between the junctions with Brook Street and Panmure Street. This is caused by cars parked on the footpath after 5.00pm and at weekends. Pedestrians and those with disabilities have to leave the footpath to get round them. The problem is one of enforcement of the law by the Department of Planning and Transportation. Correspondence with that Department confirms that following the transfer of that responsibility from Tayside Police it has not insisted on an allocation of adequate resources to deal with its duties in this respect and that it has no intention of doing so. That is regrettable since the cars present yet another hurdle for residents, day visitors and tourists of all ages and abilities seeking to use the public footpath. There can be no doubt about the need for the animal exclusion zone in the vicinity of the Blue Flag and the associated need for its rigorous enforcement. Equally there can be no doubt that the associated signage is unsightly and over engineered. It would not be out of place in an industrial estate but it has no place within a conservation area or a location which seeks to attract day visitors or tourists. In addition the need annually to remove and then replace the signs is wasteful of scarce Council resources. There are numerous examples in such seaside towns St Andrews and North Berwick of aesthetically pleasing signage which remains in place all year and indicates perfectly adequately the period to which animal exclusion applies. The replacement of the tall unsightly poles and their associated ill designed signs would be an early indication that the Council is serious about its stated commitment to a coherent approach to branding/signage within Broughty Ferry. The interpretive signs now in position at strategic locations along the Esplanade and at the entrance of the Local Nature reserve are excellent examples of what is possible at modest cost. (26). Concluding Remarks In this presentation we have focussed on what we understand to be the progress, problems and potentials associated with the waterfront area from the Stannergate to the Dichty Burn. In this we were fulfilling a commitment of the Local Community Plan to monitor and review the action plan within the Vision Document prepared in April 2007. We took as our starting point that we are in no doubt that the aims of the Vision Document (as set out in its Section1), and the challenges (as set out in Section 2), have been recognised and now form an integral part of the Local Community Plan. The next steps (as set out in its Section 8) have already been taken by way of the issue, following widespread consultation, of the Ferry Local Community Plan itself. This provides the strategic framework within which individual programmes and projects can come to successful fruition. At the strategic level there are two matters which have been drawn to our attention and which we agree give cause for concern. First, it seems that some Departments of the Council still work in relative isolation from one another They do not appear always to engage in the joined up thinking which is the prerequisite of good planning and, hence, the appropriate allocation of resources across the board. It is a continuing complaint that the silo approach extends into implementation and, if that is so, it must detract from the efficient and effective use of scarce resources. The Local Community Planning Partnerships are associated with ward boundaries. In short they are area based and, hence, provide an ideal framework, overseen by elected members, for overcoming this deficiency. Joined up thinking and implementation can become the norm. Thus, for instance, in some matters relating to the waterfront the Departments of Planning and Development, Leisure and Communities, and Waste Management all have a role to play. Addressing the issues can now be dealt with without undue delay and as a matter of routine in order to achieve the actions and outputs identified in the Local Community Plan. Second, and related to the above, as things stand, it is not at all clear to those with whom we have consulted how the actions and desired outcomes of the Local Community Plan, particularly as they relate to the built and natural environment, will link seamlessly with the Local Land Use Plan whose review is the responsibility of the Department of Planning and Transportation. Of course, if the two plans do not dovetail then a splendid opportunity will have been lost all contrary to the expectations of Scottish Ministers. These matters aside, we think that there is good reason for optimism about the future of Broughty Ferry. The Local Community Partnership and the Local Community Plan provide powerful vehicles for the Council, the private, voluntary and community sectors to move matters forward towards the achievement of a collective vision for the waterfront. We hope that we have demonstrated by our monitoring and review that there is much that has been achieved in setting up the strategic framework for future achievement. There is much that can be achieved in the immediate future by the Council within the framework of the Local Community Plan and at very modest cost. Minor matters taken together can add up to considerable improvements and progress towards what we understand is emerging as a collective vision for the future of the waterfront of the Ferry. Of course, the bright future of Broughty Ferry which we envisage is not in the hands of the Council alone; and it should not end up by default in the hands of speculative developers. It will only become a reality if the energy and talents of residents of Broughty Ferry are harnessed and channelled into worthwhile projects which are in the community interest. We have drawn attention to some possibilities in this paper. In all of this the Community Council has a key part to play as well as the array of bodies and individuals who have the interests of the Broughty Ferry community at heart. Finally, we are grateful to the Council for enabling us to play our small part in the Community Planning process. Jim Laing, Chairman of the Local Community Partnership, David MacDougall and Angie Hastie have worked without stint to assist us in our task of monitor and review. Of course, the responsibility for the content of this paper is ours alone. We hope that the real progress that we have found and the challenges still to be met will encourage more engagement by other residents who share our determination to promote a collective vision which will ensure a bright future for the waterfront and, indeed, Broughty Ferry as a whole. Bill Barr, Hugh M Begg, Andrew Nicoll With the assistance of John Allison and David Goodfellow. JS    9 G 6 Z]%*-1{|ʶʶʥ{h CJOJQJ^JaJh~vCJOJQJ^JaJhA:CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hA:CJOJQJ^JaJ&hA:h 5>*CJOJQJ^JaJ&hA:hA:5>*CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:5>*CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h\ CJOJQJ^JaJ05I8 cs!q#%' )+5-$a$gd#$a$gd&-N$a$gdi$a$gd$@$a$gdA:$a$gdA:$a$gdNQbcjH\t%?PYZ%;Ud,-@Apr័q hA:h2CJOJQJ^JaJh$@CJOJQJ^JaJhA:6CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:hA:6CJOJQJ^JaJhA:CJOJQJ^JaJ&hA:hA:5>*CJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hA:CJOJQJ^JaJh~vCJOJQJ^JaJ,r   !!!!!!."̭̜̾̋ziXG hA:h!?CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h#CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h$@CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:haCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hM,CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h:CJOJQJ^JaJh$@CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h&-NCJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:hs6CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hsCJOJQJ^JaJ.""#$#7#8#l#m#n#q#$$}$$$$<%A%E%F%j%%%%%%%%пﮜxfxfxfTT# *h$@hiCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h$@hCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h$@hrCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h$@hwlbCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h$@h2CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hiCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h9UCJOJQJ^JaJh$@CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hMCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hZACJOJQJ^JaJ%%%&&&&*'I'p''''''''''''''(((j(k(t(((ﭛתּyggVV hA:hRCJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:hZA6CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h*CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hsCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h |CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hL%lCJOJQJ^JaJh$@CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h1U9CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h&CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hLCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hZCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hBiCEMHIKLNLPPRUWY$a$gd~ $a$gd(~]$a$gd0u$a$gd?YS$a$gd:d~$a$gdNQR2S2x22243D3E3X3`3Y44444444445056575K5L5z555ͼޮzޮޮiiͮ[hMCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h>zCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h |CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h?YS6CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h?YSCJOJQJ^JaJh?YSCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h!?CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hMCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h_CJOJQJ^JaJ h$@hMCJOJQJ^JaJ5556666 7#7$7J7777777888#8?9G9ooo]]K9# *h?YShZCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YShSCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YSh_CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YShCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YShgCJOJQJ^JaJ& *h?YShg6CJOJQJ^JaJ& *h?YSh} 6CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YSh} CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h?YSCJOJQJ^JaJ *h?YSCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YSh?YSCJOJQJ^JaJG9V99999: :!:):*:H:J:`:b:j:l::::::۷۔ss_K_& *h?YSh:d~6CJOJQJ^JaJ& *h?YSh7'6CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YSh7'CJOJQJ^JaJ *h]CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hBkCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YShCrCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YSh |CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YShgCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YShBkCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YShSCJOJQJ^JaJ:::;&;*;'<(<)<<<<====>ƴrdrdrP?. h] h] CJOJQJ^JaJ h] h} CJOJQJ^JaJ&hA:h} 5>*CJOJQJ^JaJh?YSCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h?YSCJOJQJ^JaJh&JCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h:d~CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YShCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YSh0uCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h?YSh7'CJOJQJ^JaJ& *h?YSh7'6CJOJQJ^JaJ& *h?YShL%l6CJOJQJ^JaJ>>#>*>M>o>~>>>>>>>>>>?????&?{?пЮ~m\K\ hA:h0uCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h_9CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h>zCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hNQCJOJQJ^JaJhw0CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hZCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hgCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h} CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hjCJOJQJ^JaJh] CJOJQJ^JaJ{???????1@2@A@Z@a@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@AOA]ApAAABBBBBBBBCͼͼͮͮͮͮͮ͠͏͏͏~mm hA:hjCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hZCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hHCJOJQJ^JaJh]CJOJQJ^JaJh] CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h_9CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h0uCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h] CJOJQJ^JaJ*C6C7C@CHCeChCiCvCCCCC/D7D=D@DDDWEEEEܺܩ혇ykykyZLZk; hA:h>zCJOJQJ^JaJh(~]CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hI")CJOJQJ^JaJh]CJOJQJ^JaJh] CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h)$CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h9UCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hSCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hBkCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hHCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hjCJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:hj6CJOJQJ^JaJEEEEEEEF+FwFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFGGzCJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h&R6CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h>z6CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h CJOJQJ^JaJTGJHLHMHPHtHHHHHHHHHI%I&I:I?ITImInIIIIIIIửm[I# *h(~]h CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]h4CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]h(~]CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]hSCJOJQJ^JaJhw0CJOJQJ^JaJh0CJOJQJ^JaJh]CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h(~]CJOJQJ^JaJ)hA:h0uB*CJOJQJ^JaJphh(~]CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h0uCJOJQJ^JaJIJJYJjJsJKKKK+K\KbKnKKKKKKKKKKKKɺۨr```rOAh(~]CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hXCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]hEQ{CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]hXCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]hCJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]h4CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]h&RCJOJQJ^JaJ *hw0CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]h CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]h(~]CJOJQJ^JaJ# *h(~]hCJOJQJ^JaJKKKKL L LL:LHLLLLLLLLLLMMMɵ~m\N=N=N=N= hA:h^AECJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hBCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hOCJOJQJ^JaJ *hw0CJOJQJ^JaJ& *hh:d~6CJOJQJ^JaJ& *hhi6CJOJQJ^JaJ& *hh 6CJOJQJ^JaJ# *hh CJOJQJ^JaJ# *hh(~]CJOJQJ^JaJ# *hh:d~CJOJQJ^JaJMMM N N-NNNN O O=OOOOIPKPLPSPʹxxxgVB&hA:h 5>*CJOJQJ^JaJ h0h&JCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h:d~CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h^AECJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hBCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h4CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h46CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h:d~6CJOJQJ^JaJSPTPdPePPPPPPPPPPRQSQ{Q|QQQQR RǶuudVdHu7 hA:hpvCJOJQJ^JaJh0CJOJQJ^JaJhw0CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h0CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h0uCJOJQJ^JaJ hh CJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJ h5>*CJOJQJ^JaJ&hA:h 5>*CJOJQJ^JaJ&hA:h"Y5>*CJOJQJ^JaJ R'RRRT2TBTeTTTTU=UvUUUUUUUV1V8VVVVVuWvWWWWWWWWWWͿo hA:h>TCJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h6CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJh9CJOJQJ^JaJh0CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h>UCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hpvCJOJQJ^JaJ%WW XXX!X"X#X$X%X:XbXcXfXXXXXYYYYYJZKZппsbP? hA:hdCJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:hd6CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h~ CJOJQJ^JaJhw0CJOJQJ^JaJh~ CJOJQJ^JaJh9CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:he}OCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hv1CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h/ CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hBCJOJQJ^JaJYY[_!c0efhFmpxuuxwy}mRST$a$gdo$a$gdU#$a$gdF$a$gdaV$a$gd* $a$gd7$a$gdNQKZRZZZZs[[[[[[.\\(])]C]D]]]]﫚xgxgxVE hA:h7CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h^AECJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hrCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h>TCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h>zCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hdCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hpvCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h](CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h~XcCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:he}OCJOJQJ^JaJ]]^^6^`^a^^__a_e_m___________겡t_N@Nh~ CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h7CJOJQJ^JaJ)h9h7B*CJOJQJ^JaJph h9h9CJOJQJ^JaJh9CJOJQJ^JaJhw0CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hCrCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h~XcCJOJQJ^JaJ#h~ B*CJOJQJ^JaJph)hA:h^AEB*CJOJQJ^JaJph)hA:h7B*CJOJQJ^JaJph_ ` `A`D`cccc c!cDcGcfcwcxcccccc޻ziWEizi4i4 hA:h$CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:hB6CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h^6CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h^CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hBCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h9CJOJQJ^JaJh9CJOJQJ^JaJ h9h9CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h7CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h>T6CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h>TCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h](CJOJQJ^JaJcd"ddddddddddee(e)e*e,e-e.e/e4eCeDeNezeeͼﮝ}lZllI hA:ho CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h$6CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h$CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h9CJOJQJ^JaJh96CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h CJOJQJ^JaJh CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h](CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h}$CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hpvCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hBCJOJQJ^JaJeeeeef fffCfRffffffffff g ggkgvggggg+h/h]hhhhhhhhͿͿͮ͝͏}n}ͮ͝͏͏ͮ͝͝͝͝h96CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h96CJOJQJ^JaJh9CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h](CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hpvCJOJQJ^JaJh~ CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h}$CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h$CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h^CJOJQJ^JaJ&h=i>iGiHiNiOiSiWiiiiFjLjjjjPkSk^kkkll3lEl˹˧˖ttcRctcRtRA hA:h7CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:haVCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h](CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:ho CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h/ CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h$CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h/ 6CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:haV6CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h$6CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:hxv6CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hxvCJOJQJ^JaJElFlvlllllllll@mAmEmFmooaomXG6G hA:haVCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h~CJOJQJ^JaJ)hU#hN@B*CJOJQJ^JaJph,hU#h96B*CJOJQJ^JaJph)hU#h9B*CJOJQJ^JaJph#hU#B*CJOJQJ^JaJph)hU#hU#B*CJOJQJ^JaJph)hA:h B*CJOJQJ^JaJph)hA:h B*CJOJQJ^JaJph)hA:h7B*CJOJQJ^JaJphaoooo0ppppppq qqqIqTqqqqqrvvvvvvwTwUwwwxtx{x~xxxxyyͻ}l[l[}[}[}[JJ} hA:hL%lCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:haVCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hu@CJOJQJ^JaJhFCJOJQJ^JaJhU#CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hU#CJOJQJ^JaJ hU#hu@CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h* 5CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h* CJOJQJ^JaJh96CJOJQJ^JaJ#hA:h96CJOJQJ^JaJyy!y"y+y.yTyWytyuyvyyyyyyyyyKzXzdz{zzzzzzf{j{{{{{{{{{{{{{H|_|g||||||||||}+}F}Z}}}}򩷩򩷩hsCJOJQJ^JaJh8CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hL%lCJOJQJ^JaJhU#CJOJQJ^JaJhFCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ<}} ~M~`~~+<A~Հ"<CYqՁ(>̃&WXmtuy݅&ŴӴӴӴӴӦӕŕŕńńńŦ hA:hoCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hU#CJOJQJ^JaJh CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hX0vCJOJQJ^JaJhIRCJOJQJ^JaJh8CJOJQJ^JaJhFCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hFCJOJQJ^JaJ4&'Ն߆'ևQRVWXYZ[]ӣ{jYH hA:hjCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h>TCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h* CJOJQJ^JaJ,hA:h 6B*CJOJQJ^JaJph hA:hCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hN@CJOJQJ^JaJ h h CJOJQJ^JaJhoCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hoCJOJQJ^JaJhIRCJOJQJ^JaJh CJOJQJ^JaJTUVWXYZ^_bcde$a$gdNQ$a$gd* $a$gdaV ]_ce hA:h4CJOJQJ^JaJ hA:hMCJOJQJ^JaJ hA:h} CJOJQJ^JaJ21h:py~. A!"#$% j 666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~ OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH J`J y~Normal dCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA D Default Paragraph FontRiR 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k ( 0No List RR 0 Balloon Text dCJOJQJ^JaJRR 0Balloon Text CharCJOJQJ^JaJtH PK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] e r."%(A+/R25G9:>{?CETGIKMSP RWKZ]_cehElaosuy}&]eEGHIJKLMOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]_`abcdefghijl5-YTeFN^k8@0(  B S  ?[aggJS6b)],]yyW}X}t}u}}}&~'~~~xxQgJS6b)],]yyW}X}t}u}}}&~'~~~xxQXg~ F~vw09]( }  b+ * o 4Fa7NQxv]Bk6&J>U\ ~ U#}$)$&7'I")\)M,a-o/0v12 "481U9A:H>$@N@BrB^AE&-Ne}O8FPTPU(~]_wlb_Dc~XcjL%lnoCr6t0uX0vpv>zvzEQ{ |:d~r~Lu@R_9/ $ZAO#:my~XTs&S+VQMBH\Z"Y] dl^4]Q&RHi!? 9UgsaV4eg@bbVbbeX@UnknownG*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3. *Cx Arial7.{ @Calibri5. *[`)TahomaA BCambria Math"hhFs)8G8!82070H88218/C288!0!870C2780H728T78!TT  @L@ xLahP /T @L@ xLah|prepared in April 2007.8!888!7807/C8!08788TXo@L@xLahP /-T`p#@L@pxLahTWe b7 TW  @L@X9Lahwelcome this opportunity to continue to participate in thG828T8828788!8818288878888!288888T # @L@ Lahe plan making process and its 8888T82778!828228881 T(X& # @L@X OLahconsequent monitoring and review. The purpose of this paper is to monitor the 2882878780T888!7718881!818G11>88178!88280718208878!12181S888!187 TX # @L@X KLahactions and outcomes which have emerged since the completion of the Vision 82882888798817T729G8289881898T8!78892827978927T8888978888C277 TX/  @L@X LahDocument almost 2 years agoH828S88!8T81"8"188!2"878T/ j @L@ Lahl. We recognise  b7"!8187827"T|k / @L@k Lah\some of 28T8!7"T / @ @L@ Lahxwhat has been achievedG88"882!8788"8188188TTA/ b @L@A LahP "Tdc/ # @L@c LahTand 877 TX [" @L@X Lahpdraw attention to 8!8G888888T|\ " @L@\ Lah\some of 27T78T " @L@ Lahthose matters which remain8818S88!2G828!8T88TT " @L@ LahP T )" @L@ Lahhas challenges8228878772T* #" @L@* Lahp. In a number of 8887S88!7 T,X7 # @L@X PLahareas we go further and, drawing on our understanding of current circumstances, 8!882,G8,78,8!88!,788,8!8G87,88,88!,8888!278887,7,28!!78,2!28T278281 TX * @L@X 4Lahmake proposals for consideration as the way forward.T828&8!888182&8!'278288!878'82'78'G81'8!G8!8TX 4 * @L@  LahP ''T5 %* @L@5  LahThose highlighted in yellow >8828'8687888'8'189H TlX? L @L@X LahXmightT78TTM? h @L@M LahP Ti? @L@i 5Lahbe taken up by voluntary and community organisations.878188888128888!188827ST8818!78828882TT ?  @L@ LahP TT ? G @L@ LahP 6 T,V $ @L@Xq PLahAt the outset we should make clear 3 important points. First, although we were C/78/7827/G8/28788.T827/288!.8/S78!88/8882./=!2/788878/G8/G8!8 T@X $ @L@X SLahinvited by the Council to prepare our study as a part of its approach to community 8188'81'88'H7882&8'8!788!8&88!'2881'72'8'78!'7'2'788!8818'8'17TS881 T,X * @L@Xz%Lah&" WMFC {engagement we are all volunteers. We887878T78G88!88188888!2a7TT+ H @L@+ zLahP T\I #@L@I z-Lahare completely independent of the Council in 8!718T8881887887887788G88827 T X$@L@XNLahour opinions and judgements. We have gone to considerable lengths in our own 88!+888782+888+8868T782+)b7+7818+7888+8+288278!888+78782+8+88!+8G9 T@X(#@L@XSLahtime to consult as widely as we can not only through our membership of bodies such T882782882G88182G8288877818!887878!T7T78!2887888822827 TxX@L@XLah\as the 829889Tl@L@LahXDundeH8878TT@L@LahPe8TTW@L@LahP 9TXf@L@XLahpCivic Trust, the H139>!829789TgQ @L@gLahlBroughty Ferry C!887819=8!"19T`R % @L@R LahTComH8TT& #@L@& Lahmunity Council, the Beach T8819I88829889B8817 T$X0 @L@X$LahManagement Committee and various subS88878S88BH7TT88B888B18!882B288TT 07 @L@ LahP- T8 0#@L@8 "Lahcommittees of the Local Community 28ST782B7B88B7828BH8ST881 T@X#$@L@XSLahPlanning Partnership but also with our friends, neighbours, associates and members C88887B8!88!28778828G888!!78818878878!282182882878S7T88!1 TX9@L@XLLahof our service clubs. This has been time consuming but interesting and, we 7&88!&28!128&2882&'>82&882%8878&T8&27828T87&88&88!8277&888&G8&Tp9#@L@LahXhope, 8887 TDW#,@L@XTLahworthwhile. As will be clear from this presentation we do not pull our punches and G8!9G88%%C2%G%87%288!$!7S%82$8!8278878%G8%78%78%88$88!%7882782$877 T`WA@L@XLahTwe G8*T4A$@L@QLahoffer criticism where we believe that is justified by public opinion and our own 88!*2!22T*G88!8*G8*88918*88*2*8288*81*8882*88888*878*88!*8G8 TX5@L@X GLahassessment of matters as long established residents of Broughty Ferry. 822822S887S88!18288781882788!7288827C 88781=8!"1TT5@L@ LahP 6 TXC @L@X Lah`Second, thC82878)7TXD @L@DLahPe 8)T @L@LahlVision Document C288)G828S88(T @L@ Lah`focussed 8282278)T W @L@  Lah`on a part 88(8)88!)TlX 7 @L@X LahXonly 881)T`8  @L@8 LahTof 8)Td i @L@ LahTthe 88)Tj # @L@j LahxFerry: the waterfront =8 !1)88*G88!!87 TX! @L@X{4Lahfrom the Stannergate to the Dichty Burn and the area!7T 78 C7888!788 8 88 H281 C8!&WMFC{8 88888 8!78TT ! @L@ {LahPs2TT ! @L@ {LahP T !?@L@ {Lahimmediately adjacent to that. TS88781!888278 8 78 T`X@L@XLahTIt T@L@ Lahdwas limited G82T88T|U@L@Lah\because 8828818TV$@L@V@Lahit did not extend far into Central Broughty Ferry or West Ferry 8888818888!88H88!8C!88781=8!!28!b82=8!!1 TX*~@L@X Lahhand it did no8888787T *#@L@NLaht take in any part of Balgillo and Barnhill. On the other hand, it did focus 818778188!7C878878C8!88N888878!8878888281 TX@L@XELahon those areas of land which previous consultations by the Council ha88!7828!8!782!7!877!G828!8!91882!288288882 81!88!H8882 88TT@L@LahPd8TT@L@LahP !T#@L@ Lahdrevealed as !818888 82 TX2 @L@X>Lahhaving numerous problems of concern for all Ferry residents. 8818788T8!7828!788T2727828!78!8=8!!1!828882TT 2L @L@ LahP 6 T X Fy@L@Xd LahThird, we were concerned only wi>8!8#G8#G8!8#28828 888"881$GTtG $y@L@Gd1Lahth matters of land use and environmental amenity 8#T88!2#7#878#828"888"881!88T788"8S881 T4X#@L@XQLahin general. Accordingly, our work can be only a small contribution to the Local 827888!822C218!8771288!2G8!2228828728812822T82278!78882828818828 TX#@L@XmJLahCommunity Plan emanating from a small group of interested residents. The H8ST881AC88@8S88887A!7TA8A1T8A7!888A7A88!8277A!828882A@=87 T<X @L@X(LahCommunity Plan has a much wider scope. H8ST881C878817T818G88!22888TT  @L@ LahP 6% % 6h6ah6a66g6`g6`66f6_f6_66e6^e6^66d6]d6]66c6\c6\66b6[b6[66a6Za6Z66`6Y`6Y6 6 _6X_6X 6  6 ^6W^6W 6  6 ]6V]6V 6  6 \6U\6U 6  6 [6T[6T 6 6Z6SZ6S66Y6RY6R66X6QX6Q66W6PW6P66V6OV6O6  KS.@"Arial---  2 SHSL @"Arial---@ Arial------ 2 mSLI#2 mSLmagine Broughty 2 mSLFerry: 2 mSL 42 m!SLTowards a Collective Visionl  - @ !-o- 2 mSL ---(2 SLMonitoring Documentn  - @ !{- 2 gSL --- 2 fSL(2 j SLPresented 2 SL _2 8SLat the event to mark the Opening of the Local Community     - @ !f----d2 y;SLPartnership at Castle Green Leisure Centre on 21 March 2009.     2 SL)- @ !ay- 2 SL ---2 H SLIntroduction- @ !FH- 2 SL ---J2 H*SLAs a contribution to the Ferry Local Commu  "2 ;SLnity Plan (LCP) 2 SL )2 SLwe have been tasked  @"Arial-@"Arial- @"Arial-@"Arial- @"Arial--2 HTSLwith monitoring and reviewing the action plan set out in Imagine Broughty Ferry:    V2 H2SLTowards a Collective Vision (the Vision Document)     2 gSL .2 mSLprepared in April 2007.2 SL 2 SLWe r a2 H9SLwelcome this opportunity to continue to participate in th0 82 lSLe plan making process and its  2 $HOSLconsequent monitoring and review. The purpose of this paper is to monitor the    |2 4HKSLactions and outcomes which have emerged since the completion of the Vision t    42 DHSLDocument almost 2 years agot   "2 DSL. We recognise  2 D@SLsome of  ,2 DoSLwhat has been achieved  2 DSL 2 DSLand &2 THSLdraw attention to  2 TSLsome of  22 TSLthose matters which remain    2 TfSL 2 Ti SLas challenges&2 TSL. In a number of  2 dHPSLareas we go further and, drawing on our understanding of current circumstances,   Y2 tH4SLmake proposals for consideration as the way forward.   2 tmSL 52 twSLThose highlighted in yellow  2 HSLmighto  2 eSL [2 i5SLbe taken up by voluntary and community organisations.t  2 SL  2 SL 2 HPSLAt the outset we should make clear 3 important points. First, although we were     2 HSSLinvited by the Council to prepare our study as a part of its approach to community   C2 H%SLengagement we are all volunteers. We    2 SL O2 -SLare completely independent of the Council in   2 HNSLour opinions and judgements. We have gone to considerable lengths in our own   2 HSSLtime to consult as widely as we can not only through our membership of bodies such    2 HSLas the 2 sSLDundee  2 SLe 2 SL %2 SLCivic Trust, the  "2 SLBroughty Ferry 2 \SLComd 22 uSLmunity Council, the Beach  A2 H$SLManagement Committee and various sub     2 6SL->2 :"SLcommittees of the Local Community    2 HSSLPlanning Partnership but also with our friends, neighbours, associates and members   }2 HLSLof our service clubs. This has been time consuming but interesting and, we    2 SLhope, 2 -HTSLworthwhile. As will be clear from this presentation we do not pull our punches and     2 =HSLwe e2 =\QSLoffer criticism where we believe that is justified by public opinion and our own n  v2 MHGSLassessment of matters as long established residents of Broughty Ferry.    2 MSL 2 gH SLSecond, th2 gSLe #2 gSLVision Document   2 g SLfocussed c2 g% SLon a part 2 g\SLonly 2 gwSLof y2 gSLthe ,2 gSLFerry: the waterfront Y2 vH4SLfrom the Stannergate to the Dichty Burn and the area   2 vgSLs 2 vmSL :2 vqSLimmediately adjacent to that.  2 HSLIt 2 R SLwas limited  2 SLbecause k2 @SLit did not extend far into Central Broughty Ferry or West Ferry   2 H SLand it did no2 NSLt take in any part of Balgillo and Barnhill. On the other hand, it did focus  s2 HESLon those areas of land which previous consultations by the Council ha   2 SLd 2 SL 2  SLrevealed as h2 H>SLhaving numerous problems of concern for all Ferry residents.    2 SL ;2 H SLThird, we were concerned only wi U2 1SLth matters of land use and environmental amenity r   2 HQSLin general. Accordingly, our work can be only a small contribution to the Local   z2 HJSLCommunity Plan emanating from a small group of interested residents. The     G2 H(SLCommunity Plan has a much wider scope.    2 /SL "System???????????--LLSSLLSSKKSSKKSSKKRRKKRRKKRRKKRRKKRRKKRRJJRRJJRRJJQQJJQQJJQQJJQQJJQQJJQQJJQQ՜.+,0 hp|  A$ - Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmopqrstuwxyz{|}~Root Entry F@]Data n1Tablev?WordDocument4SummaryInformation( DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjy  F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q